Part 1: In part 1, Meno and Socrates are talking about what is a virtue. This can be taught? And they used a series of examples.
Is it possible to manage a state well, or a house, or anything at all, if you do not
manage it temperately and justly?
Meno
Surely not.
Socrates
Then whoever manages temperately and justly will manage with temperance and justice?
Meno
That must be.
Socrates
Then both the woman and the man require the same qualities of justice and temperance, if
they are to be good.
Meno
Evidently.
Socrates
And what of a child or an old man? Can they ever hope to be good if they are intemperate
and unjust?
Meno
Surely not.
Socrates
Only if they are temperate and just?
Meno
Yes.
Socrates
So all mankind is good in the same way; for they become good when they acquire the
same qualities.
Meno
So it seems.
Socrates
And I presume, if they had not the same virtue, they would not be good in the same way.
For me, everyone has the ability to see things in the true light. That’s like a ruler in your life, help you measure your future. And we know what should do, what should not do. virtue may be taught by our parents and our teachers, we may get ideas from our own selves, or maybe that is the gift from the god. However, there is no single criterion for virtue. We need to use our own knowledge to determine whether is a virtue or not.
Your explanation is very clear, but you extract some more.
You conclude very well at the last paragraph but the quote is too long.
I liked your explanation at the end, however I think an introduction might help next time because I found that I was confused reading your post until the end with your explanation.
I think it’s a very good idea to say what you think of virtue in the last paragraph. It’s very simple, but it makes sense.