William James’s The Moral Equivalent of War is the first essay I’ll talk about. In this essay, James considers how, in spite of its cruelty, war can help people develop virtues like courage, self-control, and camaraderie. He makes the case that despite war’s destructive nature, it can also be used for good. According to him, our ancestors’ aggression is a natural aspect of who we are and cannot be eradicated. James argues that without war, life might seem pointless and dull. In order to maintain order and direction, he acknowledges that maintaining some military-like discipline would be necessary to achieve peace, but he also characterizes war as an inevitable aspect of human existence.
Eric MacKnight examines whether war is required to channel what he refers to as “hyper-masculinity” in his essay Can Real Men Live in a Peaceful Society? The idea of a powerful, fearless warrior who thrives on conflict and conventional male roles is what this alludes to. This is comparable to “hyper-femininity,” which MacKnight describes as a stereotype of a seductive but unfaithful woman. He asserts that a new definition of masculinity has emerged as a result of contemporary shifts, combining strength with an emphasis on the home and family. MacKnight agrees with James that mandatory military service could teach discipline and provide a constructive outlet for young men’s aggressive tendencies. He notes that chivalry was once employed to restrain male aggression, but as these principles wane, he wonders if war and bloodshed will always be part of being human