An Inspector Calls: A Lesser Review

When I was finished the part-epic-part-review and retired to the hospital to treat for my great journey to the end of the page, I couldn’t help but notice a connection between Lesser’s own review, to Miller’s.  Likewise to Miller, Lesser only sees Gerald as a highly touted aristocrat with ‘the attitude of a master’, an attribute someone like Birling would possess. Both reviews are highly contradictory to the Gerald character our class has come to know, and I’d say that both are wrong. Unlike Miller’s review, however, Lesser did provide some sort of evidence to support her assertion, which was that Gerald didn’t see the extras like Sheila did. This may be due to Daldry’s own error, as he himself didn’t give Gerald’s actor any instruction in regards to the extras, which built on his aristocratic, ‘Geraldish’ behaviour.  Also, both pointed out the ‘defiance’ of sorts that the younger generation put up against the older beings.

Despite the one minor resemblance between the reviews, Lesser’s review on a whole was more in depth, though her review does rival the length of Ulysses. Lesser noted the how Goole in fact sounded like ghoul, with the slight assumption of him possibly being Casper’s own kind. She also talks about Edna’s importance in the play, one character which I really never thought more than just a support’s supporting character. As if to further proves Edna’s part in the whole Smith suicide debacle, Lesser groups Edna with Sheila and Eric as the ‘likeable, comparatively heroic figures’

The best part of the review in my opinion was how Lesser identified the importance of the new beginning. As I wrote on my reflection on Miller’s review, I all but denounced Daldry’s change the start of An Inspector Calls, and asked if the play itself benefited at all to the new beginning. It did. Lesser explains perfectly how the beginning built on the older beings outright refusal to acknowledge an extra, and regard them as ‘simply and element in the portentously disturbing atmosphere’. In short, I found Lesser’s review to be far less enjoyable than Miller’s, largely, and well, wholly responsible for by the length. The redeeming factor though, is how she refuted Plato’s ‘attack on drama’ by contradicting his age old reasoning by saying yes, fictional plays do have a value of truth in the real world, which is, if it were up to my guess and that’s never good, the purpose of An Inspector Calls.

Be the first to like.

3 comments to An Inspector Calls: A Lesser Review

  • Mr. MacKnight

    Mike, you make some good points here, but they are undercut by the sloppy writing errors.

    • Mike Li

      Could you provide some examples that I can possibly improve on in the future?

      • Mr. MacKnight

        “I was finished the part epic part”; “Likewise to Miller”; “highly-toted”; “posses”; “contradictory to the Gerald character”; “like Sheila did”; ” the older beings”.

Recent Comments