by Albert, on September 11th, 2012
Between Lopate and Matousek’s talk, the most interesting point for me was how they linked biology and evolutions into the foundation of ethical judgements and religions. I do agree with this as humans are still animals that are not free of rejecting their natural instinct, to some degrees though. I think the idea of [...]
by Albert, on September 7th, 2012
The concept of human rights, in my opinion, is an idea that was brought up for welfare of people and promotion of equality. Which means, it is purely human’s thought. It is probably not one of the ideas that humans instinctively have, or may be. Strictly speaking, humans are also one of those animals [...]
by Albert, on August 31st, 2012
Through the activity I realized that the perspective matters significantly when facing different dilemmas. Especially the ones as a regulator of the laws. I realized an Ethics maybe useful/ maybe important in terms of controlling crowds ../ Also learned that people tend to harshly criticize on not sounding regulations that may oppose an universal [...]
by Albert, on August 28th, 2012
1. Friend
2. Woman
3. Male
4. Boat man
5. Sleeper
I think there is no definite answer to the question as the perspectives matter in ‘ranking’ . It really depends on how you define ‘good’ and ‘bad’
1. Although no specific details are given, the friend is positioned as the best since [...]
by Albert, on June 17th, 2012
It is very hard to distinguish biased from opinions, but generally former refers to a strongly expressed opinions while latter refers to just simple subjective expressions. However, when we think about it down to deep , we realize that there is a major problem distinguishing one from another.
Personally, I would say biased and [...]
by Albert, on June 4th, 2012
We discussed if math is a language or not. Arguments arouse from the point if ‘anything’ can be a language or not. Frankly, this is just a trick of words. It really depends on how, to your own extent, a language is.
If language is generously defined, such as- as long as it has [...]
by Albert, on June 1st, 2012
In last TOK class we discussed about the math and if the math would be applied same in every part of universe. Actually, this is one of the axiom that math, mostly physics theory is written upon. Most of the theories assume that mathematics and the rules we use on this planet works just [...]
by Albert, on May 24th, 2012
It was very helpful to see others presentations. I learned a lot about organization of the presentation. I think many of us lacked including me lacked specific aspects that the mark scheme requires such as different point of view. I think many presentations pretty much ended up too focusing on their own point of [...]
by Albert, on May 7th, 2012
In last TOK class, we discussed if math was discovered or invented. Personally, I think math is rather invented than it is discovered. Math so far is magnificent method to explain and describe nature and explain things happening. However it is not that we discover what is already out there, math is completely artificial [...]
by Albert, on April 28th, 2012
In last TOK class, we discussed about math. The discussion raised a question: if the mathematics is important to everyone in their life. I would say partly yes.
Mathematics originates from human’s ability of logical reasoning, math is a tool that is made to explain stuffs. This characteristic of mathematics is used for natural [...]
by Albert, on April 16th, 2012
Q2.How can a literary work of fiction, which is by definition non-factual, convey knowledge?
The literary mean of fiction is a fake- non-existing story. The term sounds as if it is non -relevant to life at all . However, fiction actually provides a great source of experience. The fictions convey experience – which [...]
by Albert, on April 1st, 2012
Naming street is impossible to be done perfectly objective, but then it has to be objective to some extent.. In this case you would take some figures that ‘majority’ people wouldn’t argue against (but then this is disputable again) Okay i will try to be as objective as possible, maybe the most objective theme [...]
by Albert, on March 22nd, 2012
Mark pullen’s mystery provided interesting point about history.
First of all, to start with, with the given information for mark pullen’s case I would say there can be some possible interpretation to the situation however there is absolutely no way to confirm anything.
One of the reason is due to the characteristic of the [...]
by Albert, on March 17th, 2012
In last TOK class we discussed if history could be called as an art or a science. I would say history is in a way art and scientific at the same time.
History is rather a story, it is often hard to find any piece of history that is not affected by subjective opinions. [...]
by Albert, on January 21st, 2012
observation -> Hypothesis -> prediction -> Experiment is the general steps of forming a theory and this is called Scientific Method. With such sequences our understanding of nature improves. But why scientific method is defined to be such? The significance of this method is that the steps to the ultimate product is designed to [...]
by Albert, on January 20th, 2012
In the letter the writer claims Umbrellaology to be a proper scientific field, providing specific examples of his work. However, it seems like it is lacking the proper process of confirmation and theory-evidences.
Although the concept of Umbrellaology flaws in some scientific aim, it seems like it has some criteria that can overlap with [...]
by Albert, on January 15th, 2012
We discussed about Science and Pseudoscience in last class. The discussion was further extended to the points about religions and such. What is difference between Pseudoscience and Science?>
Pseudoscience is essentially a fake science, a good example we discussed being “Placebo effect”. The most notable thing about pseudoscience is that it does not follow [...]
by Albert, on November 14th, 2011
Discussion about right reason in last TOK discussion got me thinking about it. What is the reason for something? What is a right reason? WHat is an opinion? These questions were useful that made me think about it. The reason that everyone can refer to would be something that has no logical false that [...]
by Albert, on November 11th, 2011
It was a particularly interesting topic and I really liked how Mr.Dawkin took the view of world as “middle world”. Super interesting. As he states, as science evolved and evolved, the theory of science always brought up results that do not meet our perspective expectations. Following such fact, our cosmos is truly full of [...]
by Albert, on November 7th, 2011
We discussed about possible difference between people’s perception. I think it was really interesting to think about if the color you see is the same color that other sees? Who can provide answer for that? because you do not know how to “objectively” define the color you see. Again, this is where Science comes [...]
by Albert, on November 4th, 2011
Thinking about brain in vats questions, it seems like its in our nature that we always doubt reality even to the point where we percieve by sense perception. It is surely a confusing question, as you do not have possible way to figure out answer, but it does really matter when it comes to [...]
by Albert, on October 31st, 2011
According to dictionary.com the definition of “know” follows :
1.
to perceive or understand as fact or truth; to apprehendclearly and with certainty: I know the situation fully. 2.
to have established or fixed in the mind or memory: to knowa poem by heart; Do you know the way to the park from here? 3.
to be cognizant or aware of: I know it. 4.
be acquainted with (a thing, place, person, etc.), as bysight, experience, or report: to know the mayor. 5.
to understand from experience or attainment (usuallyfollowed by how before an infinitive): to know how to makegingerbread. we can see the definition of “to know” includes understanding by sense perceptions. I believe when one claims “to know” about something, his/her experience (derived from sense perceptions) is the most reliable reason. Why? simply [...]
by Albert, on October 28th, 2011
On monday’s lesson, We talked about some words that has two meanings and discussed whether it affects communication or not. We mentioned that it does affect one’s communication because use of English is always different from regions to regions. Though, I do not think this is the original problem of English. If this is [...]
by Albert, on October 23rd, 2011
Really interesting to read different opinions. As Graham states in his article, lying to children is a really debatable topic to think about. I was pretty amazed that I just realized we actually do lie to younger people who probably have less understanding of things than we do. why do we do so?
One [...]
by Albert, on October 8th, 2011
We talked about if we think differently in different languages. I think we do. I speak English, Korean and a little bit of Chinese. From my experience dreaming in Korean and English makes quite a big difference, however it does not make much difference when thinking in Chinese and in Korean. When I translate [...]
by Albert, on September 16th, 2011
The Truman show truly motivates people to question about their lives and bring us to the question “what is to know?” that most of us are aware but never had deep thought in. Even if it varies from person to person, at some point of our life, we grant somethings to be “definitely true”. [...]
by Albert, on September 12th, 2011
In what ways is truman’s life fake?
I think his life must be real as Truman himself believed. Even if his life was built and Truman meant to be who is Truman now, the person who lived that life was Truman. No matter what Truman lived in the way he believed and so [...]
|
|
Important Dates Y12 Orals: May 22, May 31, June 5, June 7.
June 11: Y12 TOK Day
-----------------------
"The arts, ideas, natural beauty, and good conversation provide lasting pleasure."
-----------------------
"The less people know, the more stubbornly they know it."
—Werner Vogels
Your Daily Chinese Character
Comments . . . . . . are open only to students of the class, but if you are a non-student and would like to comment you can email Mr. MacKnight at ericmacknight AT mac DOT com.
Is TOK a Philosophy Course? YES, in the sense that the name of the course itself is in any dictionary effectively synonymous with "epistemology."
NO, in the sense that IB-specific ToK has many philosophical elements, but is not just philosophy. ToK is at root an interdiscipinary course that allows students to become aware of how the six subject-groups on the corners on the Diploma hexagon overlap and integrate. The interdisciplinary aspect is the crucial thing . . . .
—Bruce Bartlett
Le Collège français
Toronto, Canada
-----------------------------
"A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking."
—Steven Wright
-----------------------------
Webs & Chains Natura in reticulum sua genera connexit,
non in catenam: homines non possunt nisi
catenam sequi, cum non plura simul
possint sermone exponere.
Nature knits up her kinds in a network, not
in a chain; but men can follow only by
chains because their language can’t handle
several things at once.
—Albrecht von Haller (tr. Howard Nemerov)
[Epigraph to Nemerov's poem, "The Dependencies"]
About This Blog Until June 2011, this TOK blog was managed solely by Eric MacKnight. Beginning in the fall of 2011, its name changed to "DCSZ TOK Class Blog", and since then it has been used by all TOK students at Dulwich College Suzhou. The lead teacher is Julie Connah, assisted by Alan Connah and Eric MacKnight. Content posted before August 2011 was written by Eric MacKnight and his students at Suzhou Singapore International School. In August 2012 John Fitzgerald replaced Alan Connah in the DCSZ TOK team.
|
Recent Comments